<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress Should Return Toy Safety Regulation to the CPSC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/</link>
	<description>Information Regarding the April 1st Rally in Washington DC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-69366</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-69366</guid>
		<description>Thank you for saying this.  I am a crafter with a websie and do craft shows.  I don&#039;t know how I will be able to afford to have everything tested. I do not understand how a package of onesies snaps is tested safe for lead ,then I open that package to put ribbon on them, and then I need to have that same onesie snap tested for lead. It is not logical.  I just don&#039;t understand.  In my state there is not any testing facility, that means the $ amount will be ever increasing for what we have tested.
Thank you for fighting for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for saying this.  I am a crafter with a websie and do craft shows.  I don&#8217;t know how I will be able to afford to have everything tested. I do not understand how a package of onesies snaps is tested safe for lead ,then I open that package to put ribbon on them, and then I need to have that same onesie snap tested for lead. It is not logical.  I just don&#8217;t understand.  In my state there is not any testing facility, that means the $ amount will be ever increasing for what we have tested.<br />
Thank you for fighting for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cedric</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-55903</link>
		<dc:creator>Cedric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-55903</guid>
		<description>This affects all of us so much, but there are similar laws killing every part of our economy. We don&#039;t seem to see what doesn&#039;t hit us directly. 

The point of the Constitution was to stop laws like this from being written. We need to support those who want to keep ALL the laws in line with the Constitution. Some of the bad laws will hit us directly, some will hit others, but ALL of them hit some citizen. 

None of us deserve this kind of abuse at the hands of a despotic government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This affects all of us so much, but there are similar laws killing every part of our economy. We don&#8217;t seem to see what doesn&#8217;t hit us directly. </p>
<p>The point of the Constitution was to stop laws like this from being written. We need to support those who want to keep ALL the laws in line with the Constitution. Some of the bad laws will hit us directly, some will hit others, but ALL of them hit some citizen. </p>
<p>None of us deserve this kind of abuse at the hands of a despotic government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobMarche</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-40440</link>
		<dc:creator>BobMarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-40440</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the useful info. It&#039;s so interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the useful info. It&#8217;s so interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-30039</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-30039</guid>
		<description>Thank you Rick for putting up the good fight.
Between costly testing requirements and impossible labeling requirements I will have to shut down my cottage industry before I ever had a chance to get started.  We are a group that is not being listened to. Seems to me if Congress would just listen, then a solution could be worked out. Most of my suppliers have been more than willing to supply me with the certificates to show the raw materials I use in my products are safe.  For small manufacturers this is where a change in the  law could make a difference, along with more reasonable labeling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Rick for putting up the good fight.<br />
Between costly testing requirements and impossible labeling requirements I will have to shut down my cottage industry before I ever had a chance to get started.  We are a group that is not being listened to. Seems to me if Congress would just listen, then a solution could be worked out. Most of my suppliers have been more than willing to supply me with the certificates to show the raw materials I use in my products are safe.  For small manufacturers this is where a change in the  law could make a difference, along with more reasonable labeling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-28657</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-28657</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your well-written commentary.  This law is so harmful to so many, from the cottage industries that have always used safe materials to the children who won&#039;t have those creative and imaginative toys to play with anymore.

I don&#039;t create things for children, but as a parent this affects me just as much.  It is taking away really good choices and leaving me in the hands of the big manufacturers which can afford to comply with the law (and which in each case have been the source of the problems in the past).

It&#039;s like having a leaky faucet in someone&#039;s kitchen and having the city dig up the entire water system, replace the city pipes, charge the citizens to pay for the overhaul, and then wonder why there&#039;s still a leaky faucet and nobody can afford to pay their water bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your well-written commentary.  This law is so harmful to so many, from the cottage industries that have always used safe materials to the children who won&#8217;t have those creative and imaginative toys to play with anymore.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t create things for children, but as a parent this affects me just as much.  It is taking away really good choices and leaving me in the hands of the big manufacturers which can afford to comply with the law (and which in each case have been the source of the problems in the past).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like having a leaky faucet in someone&#8217;s kitchen and having the city dig up the entire water system, replace the city pipes, charge the citizens to pay for the overhaul, and then wonder why there&#8217;s still a leaky faucet and nobody can afford to pay their water bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-28571</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-28571</guid>
		<description>what happened to our freedom where we can make things for out children, what if your low income and can&#039;t afford to purchase the store clothing this is not fair we live in the united states of America and should be able to use are freedoms we earned stop taking them away from us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what happened to our freedom where we can make things for out children, what if your low income and can&#8217;t afford to purchase the store clothing this is not fair we live in the united states of America and should be able to use are freedoms we earned stop taking them away from us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fleecy</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-28491</link>
		<dc:creator>Fleecy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-28491</guid>
		<description>Not only does CPSIA remove one more potential source of income from the market (one would need to be independently wealthy to try to enter much of the handmade items market now, to afford labelling/testing costs, since anything that could even potentially &quot;appeal to children&quot; is under CPSIA), but now charity such as giving coats to children is effectively prohibited as well.

The people who are getting hurt the most with this are poor. Goodwill, Salvation Army, etc. are removing children&#039;s items from shelves so that they will not be liable under CPSIA. What is a parent supposed to do if they cannot afford the (soon to be more expensive due to testing costs and new labelling laws, no doubt) new coat or toy for their child? The kid is supposed to be cold and have no toys? This law didn&#039;t make things better for anyone, it tore a source of income away from many people who needed it and is making things needlessly more expensive for people who already couldn&#039;t afford many things... not a good thing in this economy. Congress should definitely hand it back to CPSC, they obviously had the situation under as much control as possible (over 99% safe judging by what you said) even before the CPSIA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only does CPSIA remove one more potential source of income from the market (one would need to be independently wealthy to try to enter much of the handmade items market now, to afford labelling/testing costs, since anything that could even potentially &#8220;appeal to children&#8221; is under CPSIA), but now charity such as giving coats to children is effectively prohibited as well.</p>
<p>The people who are getting hurt the most with this are poor. Goodwill, Salvation Army, etc. are removing children&#8217;s items from shelves so that they will not be liable under CPSIA. What is a parent supposed to do if they cannot afford the (soon to be more expensive due to testing costs and new labelling laws, no doubt) new coat or toy for their child? The kid is supposed to be cold and have no toys? This law didn&#8217;t make things better for anyone, it tore a source of income away from many people who needed it and is making things needlessly more expensive for people who already couldn&#8217;t afford many things&#8230; not a good thing in this economy. Congress should definitely hand it back to CPSC, they obviously had the situation under as much control as possible (over 99% safe judging by what you said) even before the CPSIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Martin</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-28489</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-28489</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the well spoken comments on the CPSIA.  The &quot;one-size-fits-all&quot; approach to this regulation is misguided at best.  We need to protect small businesses who have done nothing but produce safe alternatives to the mega-company model of toy production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the well spoken comments on the CPSIA.  The &#8220;one-size-fits-all&#8221; approach to this regulation is misguided at best.  We need to protect small businesses who have done nothing but produce safe alternatives to the mega-company model of toy production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hope</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-28447</link>
		<dc:creator>Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-28447</guid>
		<description>Thank you Sir, for stirring up the dust...it seems like few people are discussing this...it is too easily being swept under the rug.

Keep writing, keep talking...eventually, some one will listen (I hope).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Sir, for stirring up the dust&#8230;it seems like few people are discussing this&#8230;it is too easily being swept under the rug.</p>
<p>Keep writing, keep talking&#8230;eventually, some one will listen (I hope).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/06/regulation-to-cpsc/comment-page-1/#comment-28391</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=1253#comment-28391</guid>
		<description>Thank you Rick for all your hard work in trying to lead our current blind congress. Maybe if they cant see that the CPSIA needs reform then maybe they cant see a RE-ELECTION to office. Seems  elected officals forget who put them in office can also remove them in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Rick for all your hard work in trying to lead our current blind congress. Maybe if they cant see that the CPSIA needs reform then maybe they cant see a RE-ELECTION to office. Seems  elected officals forget who put them in office can also remove them in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

