<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letter to Moore: Jennifer of Chapter One Organics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/03/letter-to-moore-jennifer-of-chapter-one-organics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/03/letter-to-moore-jennifer-of-chapter-one-organics/</link>
	<description>Information Regarding the April 1st Rally in Washington DC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/03/letter-to-moore-jennifer-of-chapter-one-organics/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=340#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments.  Unfortunately there is a political drama surrounding us on this issue.  Not sure why since the law was voted in by both sides.  At this point I don’t think it matters who appointed the commissioners.  We need changes made to the law, it doesn’t work, it is that simple.  The law is too complicated and complex and if you ask 10 people how they are complying you get 10 different answers, that is a problem.  

The finger pointing has to stop and someone needs to take accountability for the situation.  Many of us have contacted Public Citizen only to be disappointed with the outcome.  Apparently they say we misunderstand the law.  If we do, I am still waiting for an explanation from someone.

We have many face-to-face meetings before and after the rally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.  Unfortunately there is a political drama surrounding us on this issue.  Not sure why since the law was voted in by both sides.  At this point I don’t think it matters who appointed the commissioners.  We need changes made to the law, it doesn’t work, it is that simple.  The law is too complicated and complex and if you ask 10 people how they are complying you get 10 different answers, that is a problem.  </p>
<p>The finger pointing has to stop and someone needs to take accountability for the situation.  Many of us have contacted Public Citizen only to be disappointed with the outcome.  Apparently they say we misunderstand the law.  If we do, I am still waiting for an explanation from someone.</p>
<p>We have many face-to-face meetings before and after the rally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita Anne</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/03/letter-to-moore-jennifer-of-chapter-one-organics/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=340#comment-23</guid>
		<description>First, if my previous post was not clear - I applaud Jennifer for all her work and all the others involved in this. I like to see democracy in action. 

Second, yes it was not clear where the &quot;censorship&quot; originated. 

However, it also seems obvious that a little bit more information about some aspects of this would be helpful.

1.The CPSC, which implements the laws for consumer protection, is supposed to be a three member commission.It has had two members since 2006. Nord appointed by Bush and Moore appointed by Clinton and reappointed by Bush. The third position has been vacant since 2006. The result of this lack of a third member is many 1-1 votes which make the commission ineffectual in implementing real change.

2. The groups who worked for this law are citizen interest groups- they do not represent special interests such as manufacturers. If you are interested in learning of their concern for small businesses, hand crafters etc. and their suggestions for fixing the law you can view their statement at the Public Citizen website www.citizen.org.

3. If I was involved in organizing this I would do two things: push the Obama administration to appoint a third member of the CPSC and work to have some say as to who that person is and 2. after the rally have as many people as possible visit the offices of their congress(wo)man or senators to tell them their concerns. An elected official may ignore a rally but they have a harder time ignoring voters from their district who are sitting in their office.

Good Luck to all of you for a very successful and effective rally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, if my previous post was not clear &#8211; I applaud Jennifer for all her work and all the others involved in this. I like to see democracy in action. </p>
<p>Second, yes it was not clear where the &#8220;censorship&#8221; originated. </p>
<p>However, it also seems obvious that a little bit more information about some aspects of this would be helpful.</p>
<p>1.The CPSC, which implements the laws for consumer protection, is supposed to be a three member commission.It has had two members since 2006. Nord appointed by Bush and Moore appointed by Clinton and reappointed by Bush. The third position has been vacant since 2006. The result of this lack of a third member is many 1-1 votes which make the commission ineffectual in implementing real change.</p>
<p>2. The groups who worked for this law are citizen interest groups- they do not represent special interests such as manufacturers. If you are interested in learning of their concern for small businesses, hand crafters etc. and their suggestions for fixing the law you can view their statement at the Public Citizen website <a href="http://www.citizen.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.citizen.org</a>.</p>
<p>3. If I was involved in organizing this I would do two things: push the Obama administration to appoint a third member of the CPSC and work to have some say as to who that person is and 2. after the rally have as many people as possible visit the offices of their congress(wo)man or senators to tell them their concerns. An elected official may ignore a rally but they have a harder time ignoring voters from their district who are sitting in their office.</p>
<p>Good Luck to all of you for a very successful and effective rally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridget</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/03/letter-to-moore-jennifer-of-chapter-one-organics/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=340#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Nice letter. 

Just to clarify, this is an OPEN rally and members of both parties have been invited.  The Repulicans,SO FAR, seem to be only members willing to contribute. 
 
Eventhough this law was signed in under Bush - both sides signed this into law BUT they forgot to read it!  And as bad as Bush was - we wasn&#039;t going to vote against child &quot;safety&quot;.

This law was actually created by Democratics and special interest groups (PIRG, Consumers Union, etc.) and so far they haven&#039;t been willing to admit changes are needed TO THE LAW and are instead blaming Nancy Nord (A Bush Appointee) at the CPSC.  Moore, her peer, (appointed by Clinton) doesn&#039;t see eye-to-eye with her.  This isn&#039;t rocket science. 

You can read more about the politics of CPSIA here...

http://heartkeepercommonroom.blogspot.com/2009/03/cpsia-rally-and-censorship.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice letter. </p>
<p>Just to clarify, this is an OPEN rally and members of both parties have been invited.  The Repulicans,SO FAR, seem to be only members willing to contribute. </p>
<p>Eventhough this law was signed in under Bush &#8211; both sides signed this into law BUT they forgot to read it!  And as bad as Bush was &#8211; we wasn&#8217;t going to vote against child &#8220;safety&#8221;.</p>
<p>This law was actually created by Democratics and special interest groups (PIRG, Consumers Union, etc.) and so far they haven&#8217;t been willing to admit changes are needed TO THE LAW and are instead blaming Nancy Nord (A Bush Appointee) at the CPSC.  Moore, her peer, (appointed by Clinton) doesn&#8217;t see eye-to-eye with her.  This isn&#8217;t rocket science. </p>
<p>You can read more about the politics of CPSIA here&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://heartkeepercommonroom.blogspot.com/2009/03/cpsia-rally-and-censorship.html" rel="nofollow">http://heartkeepercommonroom.blogspot.com/2009/03/cpsia-rally-and-censorship.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita Anne</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/03/letter-to-moore-jennifer-of-chapter-one-organics/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=340#comment-18</guid>
		<description>What a shame that the organizers of the rally are denying the reality of the attitude in Washington for the past several years and having as speakers the same people responsible for this attitude. It is this attitude that eroded the role that citizens expect the government to play in protecting us from harmful products. The role of the lobbyists in designing the law is obvious-small businesses will be hurt which will reduce competition for the large companies who can easily bear these costs. 
Mr. Moore&#039;s response to Representative Dingle sums it up- Make believe the reality is what you say it is and you can get people to believe your fantasy instead of reality.
Keep up the good work Jennifer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shame that the organizers of the rally are denying the reality of the attitude in Washington for the past several years and having as speakers the same people responsible for this attitude. It is this attitude that eroded the role that citizens expect the government to play in protecting us from harmful products. The role of the lobbyists in designing the law is obvious-small businesses will be hurt which will reduce competition for the large companies who can easily bear these costs.<br />
Mr. Moore&#8217;s response to Representative Dingle sums it up- Make believe the reality is what you say it is and you can get people to believe your fantasy instead of reality.<br />
Keep up the good work Jennifer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marianne</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/03/letter-to-moore-jennifer-of-chapter-one-organics/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>marianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=340#comment-10</guid>
		<description>What a wonderful response to Thomas Moore. I think you have called him out on how political this issue has become in the name of &quot;protection&quot; and has totally lost sight on the impacts on children, businesses, and our economy.

I think these lines shout out our major problem we&#039;re all facing:

&quot;In the private sector we often have to work in
imperfect environments.  If we don’t design, create, solve problems and
implement, we don’t produce products, money, or jobs.&quot;

Well done. We all would love to know what type of response YOU get back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful response to Thomas Moore. I think you have called him out on how political this issue has become in the name of &#8220;protection&#8221; and has totally lost sight on the impacts on children, businesses, and our economy.</p>
<p>I think these lines shout out our major problem we&#8217;re all facing:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the private sector we often have to work in<br />
imperfect environments.  If we don’t design, create, solve problems and<br />
implement, we don’t produce products, money, or jobs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well done. We all would love to know what type of response YOU get back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://amendthecpsia.com/2009/03/letter-to-moore-jennifer-of-chapter-one-organics/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amendthecpsia.com/?p=340#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Great letter Jennifer. If anyone else wants to hold Thomas Moore accountable for what many of us consider to be his responsibilities in working productively with his co-workers at the agency, his email address is tmoore@cpsc.gov</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great letter Jennifer. If anyone else wants to hold Thomas Moore accountable for what many of us consider to be his responsibilities in working productively with his co-workers at the agency, his email address is <a href="mailto:tmoore@cpsc.gov">tmoore@cpsc.gov</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

